Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V9800P

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs ATI FirePro V9800P

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800P to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 225W)
ATI FirePro V9800P 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +20%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800P
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1600
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cypress
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy