Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 190W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

190W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
VSA-101
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
180 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.1
2.1
OpenCL
N/A
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy