Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W600

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +328%
3.29 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
512
112
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy