Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs Intel H3C XG310

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs Intel H3C XG310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 300W)
Intel H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +38%
3.29 TFLOPS
H3C XG310
2.381 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
DG1
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy