Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285 +33%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Nov 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Baffin
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
3 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy