Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD Radeon R9 285 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Lower TDP (190W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +161%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
4096
112
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Fiji
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy