Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro V3900

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +557%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
480
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Turks
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Turks GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
50W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy