Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro V7900

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +121%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1280
128
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Cayman
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy