Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro W7100

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 200W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +24%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tonga
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy