Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +160%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Sep 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
2560
Shading Units
4480
160
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GA100
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
6.3
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy