Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FireGL V7600

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FireGL V7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +1162%
4.849 TFLOPS
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
320
160
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
127W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
R600
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
R600 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy