Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V3700

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +7476%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
40
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV620
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy