Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V4900

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +531%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Nov 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
480
160
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Turks
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy