Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R7 360E

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360E to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360E 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +200%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360E
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tobago
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy