Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD FirePro W9000

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 264.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (274W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +21%
4.849 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
274W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy