Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 70.40GB/s)
2448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +1235%
4.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
0.363 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jul 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
2560
Shading Units
112
160
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

275W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
G92B
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy