Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +54%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
32bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 24
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy