Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7600 +312%
19.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
160
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 33
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL (215-163000057)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy