Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 179.2GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +104%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1280
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Curacao
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy