Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Boost Clock933MHz
Lower TDP (200W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +45%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280
3.344 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 290 +83%
3684
Radeon R9 280
2009
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

40
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
1792
160
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

275W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tahiti
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy