Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD FirePro S7000

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD FirePro S7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X +131%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy