Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD FirePro S7150

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD FirePro S7150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X +49%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro S7150
3.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Feb 2016
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
2048
176
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.537 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.768 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
235.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Tonga
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Tonga XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy