Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X +203%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
May 2011
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Cayman
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy