Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs ATI FirePro V8700

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs ATI FirePro V8700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V8700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 108.8GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (151W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X +369%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V8700
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
800
176
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
151W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV770
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy