Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro V320 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V320 +90%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
852 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
512bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
3584
176
TMUs
224
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
230W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Vega 10
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL GL SERVER (215-0894144)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy