Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon Pro V620

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro V620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (290W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro V620 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V620 +260%
20.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
72
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4608
176
TMUs
288
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
633.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.55 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.28 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1267 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 21
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy