Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (190W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700 +467%
31.95 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Nov 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
48
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
3072
176
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 32
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Navi 32
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy