Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD Radeon R9 290X vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 290W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +45%
8.192 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Radeon R9 290X
3925
Radeon R9 Nano +17%
4607
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Aug 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

290W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Fiji
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy