Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V5700

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V5700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (56W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +1157%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V5700
0.448 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
448.0 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
56W
950 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.0
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV730
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy