Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FireStream 9170

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +1033%
5.632 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Nov 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
4
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
320
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
105W
950 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
RV670
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy