Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs ATI FirePro V5800 DVI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5800 DVI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +410%
5.632 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800 DVI
1.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
800
176
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
74W
950 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Juniper
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy