Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +15991%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Oct 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
31W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT216
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy