Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +12415%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
2816
Shading Units
16
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
50W
950 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT218
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy