Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
2744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +2895%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Feb 2010
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
9
2816
Shading Units
72
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

580W
TDP
43W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GT215
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy