Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +658%
5.632 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM
0.743 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Oct 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
384
176
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
35W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GK208
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.5
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy