Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +5532%
5.632 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Mar 2013
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
48
176
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
19W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
GF119
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy