Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 172.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +116%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Aug 2023
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
70W
950 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Navi 33
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Navi 33
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy