Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 345.6GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (275W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2
5.632 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +52%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
Jun 2015
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
176
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
275W
950 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Fiji
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy