Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA T400

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 vs NVIDIA T400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 and 2GB VRAM T400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 580W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290X2 +414%
5.632 TFLOPS
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2014
Release Date
May 2021
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
345.6GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
2816
Shading Units
384
176
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
176.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
5.632 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
704.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

580W
TDP
30W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
4x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
TU117
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy