Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 64MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.496GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 500W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
203 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.496GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
20W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
RV380
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy