Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
2808 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +25959%
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
2816
Shading Units
8
176
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
25W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
G98
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy