Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +1381%
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
2816
Shading Units
128
176
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
G92B
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy