CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
VS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+101%
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Apr 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
896
176
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU117
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
75W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
2
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090D vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
4
AMD Radeon Pro W6800X vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
5
AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
6
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
7
AMD Radeon RX 480 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
8
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
9
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
10
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT X2
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy