Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (375W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +68%
5.733 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1792
176
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
375W
900 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
Tahiti
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Orthrus
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy