CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
VS
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2
+29%
5.733 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
VS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Graphics Card
Apr 2014
Release Date
Nov 2019
Volcanic Islands
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
20
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
Vesuvius
GPU Name
TU116
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Board Design
500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.3
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA P104 100
2
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon R9 270
3
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD FirePro D300
4
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
5
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 530 OEM
6
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
7
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
8
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs ATI Radeon X1600 XT Dual
9
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
10
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy