Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +1773%
5.733 TFLOPS
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
192
176
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
GK107
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
35W
900 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy