Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 4000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Apr 2004
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro FX Rankine
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
44
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
-
176
TMUs
12
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
NV41
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
GCN 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
130 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
150W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 4x SDI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy