Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 295X2 +35%
5.733 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2014
Release Date
Aug 2020
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

44
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2816
Shading Units
1280
176
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
179.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
5.733 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
716.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
85W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Vesuvius
GPU Name
Navi 14
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
GCN 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy