Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro D300

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs AMD FirePro D300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
Lower TDP (85W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (162.6GB/s vs 104.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro D300 +34%
2.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1280
48
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

85W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy