Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7770

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM vs ATI FirePro V7770

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 360 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 360 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (104.0GB/s vs 33.60GB/s)
ATI FirePro V7770 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (76W vs 85W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 360 OEM +61%
1.613 TFLOPS
FirePro V7770
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2012
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1625 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
104.0GB/s
Bandwidth
33.60GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.613 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
100.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

85W
TDP
76W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tobago
GPU Name
RV770
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GPU Variant
RV770 XT (215-0669049)
GCN 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
160 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy